So I was reading this post about sexual imagery on the covers of upcoming YA releases by Simone Elkeles and Hannah Moskowitz. And it got me to thinking.
(For the record, I think it’s fine for YA covers to show characters in sexual situations, and I have no problem with either of those covers; Invincible Summer’s cover does nothing for me personally but I’m sure it will draw in plenty of teens, and I’ve always thought all the Perfect Chemistry covers are gorgeous, this one very much included.)
But all this talk made me wonder how I would feel if a cover of a book I wrote wound up featuring sexual imagery. My first thought, which is slightly embarrassing, was that my parents would be freaked. My second thought was that I would very much like to sell some books, and if my someday-publisher thinks putting sexiness on the cover will sell more of them, then that’s fine with me. I don’t think any teen will be any more likely to engage in sex because they saw it depicted on a YA cover, and if by chance they are, well, hopefully their school offers non-abstinence-only-based sex education and they know how to protect themselves.
But I don’t think this is ever likely to be an issue in my career. Because I really doubt any book of mine would ever get a sexual cover. Because I write YA books about LGBT people.
Gay YA book covers (in the U.S. at least) tend to feature hand-holding, or close-ups of the protagonist alone, or shots of multiple people standing with an acceptable distance between them, or completely generic imagery. The only LGBT YA cover I know of with sexual imagery is the original cover for Brent Hartinger’s The Order of the Poison Oak, and from what I’ve heard, its sales were not so good. Sadly, it’s now out of print (though you can get it on Kindle, yay, with a cover featuring some very nonsexual marshmallows), whereas the book that precedes it, which doesn’t feature boys stripping on its cover, is still available.
I am not complaining about these trends. Not per se. Books have to sell, first to bookstores, then to customers (which in the case of YA includes parents). Two girls kissing on a YA cover might sell, all right, but not necessarily to the book’s target audience. And then there’s the problem of kids being afraid to be seen carrying around a book with overt gayness on the cover, and that’s no small concern; I remember well the days of being afraid to be seen walking around carrying a shopping bag from Lambda Rising, and those days continued well past my high school years.
The book I have currently out on submission has a transgender main character, so I know for sure I don’t need to worry about winding up with a sexual cover for that one. In fact, books about trans characters seem to be the only YAs still clinging to the faceless-people YA cover rule of the 2000s. (Which is, I suppose, still a step up from the original covers of Luna and Parrotfish which both featured drawings of symbolic animals.)
And my current WIP has no sex in it, so a sexual cover would be very strange and misleading. So I’m safe there, too.
But most of my future books are likely to have some sexiness in them (alas, that’s just how I roll). So I suppose someday, assuming the YA LGBT market evolves a little, I can dream about having a cover as gorgeous as Chain Reaction’s.
(Although I do wonder about the scene that the cover is presumably depicting. Why are those two crazy kids wearing their clothes in the shower? Is this a thing all the cool kids are doing now? Am I out of touch with my audience? Shoot, maybe I should go add a clothed-shower scene to my WIP after all…)
Jan 24, 2011 @ 21:08:14
Really, REALLY interesting post, thank you for this.
Jan 25, 2011 @ 06:26:58
Thank YOU!
Jan 24, 2011 @ 21:20:24
Yep. You pretty much made my night with this post!
I agree that covers play a part in selling books, but readers shouldn’t *ahem* judge a book by its cover. It’s sad to see most LGBT books not get the same treatment as hetero books in terms of covers. I, too, hope this changes someday. It’s only fair
Thanks for commenting on the Operation Awesome post, by the way!! *hugs*
Jan 25, 2011 @ 06:34:37
Thanks! Your post there really got me thinking.
Personally, I think overt sexiness like we see on the Chain Reaction cover is still a relatively recent trend in hetero YA, so it makes sense that the homo variety will take longer to catch up. But hopefully eventually the gay agenda will get its way.
Jan 24, 2011 @ 21:29:08
I too write LGBT YA (mostly gay, though I have a trans side character in the novel I’m writing now) but I can’t say I’ve ever noticed that cover trend XD Gosh, though, I think all but one of my LGBT books fit those conventions (at least somewhat). It’s kind of a sad thing, but then, , I suppose getting published at all would make me shut up about that!
I’d have to say I’d be thrilled with a beautiful cover like Chain Reactions. It IS a bit baffling (like you said, are all the kids showering in their clothes these days?) but it’s done well, and I think a lot of people would pick it up simply to see if what that cover is about.
Jan 25, 2011 @ 06:39:18
The hand-holding was the first LGBT cover trend I noticed. I’d only ever seen it on girl books though, until I was writing this post and looked up The God Box on Amazon and saw that it had been reissued with a hand-holding cover (originally it had a two-guys-standing-far-apart cover). Sure, all the hand-holding covers look great, and sure, holding hands something teen readers can relate to, but it feels a little like LGBT YA kids are stuck in the 1950s whereas their straight counterparts are living in at least the 90s.
Jan 26, 2011 @ 20:07:01
This was super interesting to think about. I agree, LGBT YA is about the least sexualized of all YA covers. I think that’s to be expected at this point in time, unfortunately. I hadn’t thought about the progress from symbolic animals to headless torsos in trans YA fiction though — that’s so crazy! (And kind of sadly hilarious.)
Jan 26, 2011 @ 20:18:35
Thanks! I find this really interesting too (and obviously I think about it a lot).
As for the trans cover evolution, I don’t know when the new cover for Parrotfish came out, but I actually wish in that case they’d stuck with the actual fish rather than changing to a face-in-shadow cover. The whole point of the book is that Grady isn’t hiding anymore, so to put his face in shadow strikes me as wrong even to the point of being condescending. But I’m probably overreacting and it’s actually just for an artsy effect.
Jan 27, 2011 @ 10:33:29
Wow, what a great post!! I write LGBTQ YA, as well, and I hadn’t realized how “asexual” the covers are. With the popularity of Glee (especially the acceptance of the character Kurt), maybe more publishers will be willing to break this trend.
Jan 27, 2011 @ 22:17:44
Thanks Pam!
I actually think Kurt’s portrayed pretty asexually too, at least compared to the straight characters on the show. But that could change when the season comes back. He’s on the frigging cover of EW, after all. And I do think Glee may be having a positive effect on LGBT YA overall, as kids who watch the show begin to realize that LGBT characters aren’t so out there after all.
Either way, the trend in covers certainly has nowhere to go but up, so fingers crossed!
Jan 27, 2011 @ 23:08:29
Really interesting post!
In another “different countries handle this differently” example, here’s a link to the cover for the Dutch edition of Empress of the World (called Fortuna, Keizerin):
http://sararyan.com/images/fortuna.jpg
Jan 28, 2011 @ 06:08:25
WHOA. That is gorgeous.
I wonder what would happen if a cover like that were released in the U.S. I’m sure some adults would be all OMG THE VAPORS but it seems like a lot of kids would be really intrigued.
Now I really want to go look up other foreign covers for U.S. LGBT YAs…
Feb 05, 2011 @ 03:39:47
Feb 27, 2011 @ 11:56:58