I read this great, thought-provoking post by Kody Keplinger (author of The DUFF which is FREAKING AWESOME btw) about bisexual characters in YA. And, like thought-provoking posts tend to do, it got me to, well, thinking.
When I was in high school, back in the 90s ― pre-Dawson’s Creek, pre-Buffy, and vastly pre-Glee, when everything my friends and I knew about gayness came from our own, um, gayness ― I recall bisexuality as being the default assumption about anyone who expressed same-sex interest. There was no expectation that just because a girl was interested in another girl one week, she wouldn’t be interested in a boy the following week. But I don’t recall using the word “bi” very much. Maybe that was a generational thing; we didn’t have many examples of people calling themselves bi (we’d never heard the acronym “LGBTQ” either), so it didn’t occur to us.
Today, the vocabulary of the LGBTQ movement has entered the mainstream, and so labels are much more the thing. Kids come out earlier, too, both to themselves and to others. And in some cases, certainly, there is a rush to claim a label of their very own.
But the thing that hasn’t changed from my own teen years to today is the fact that high school is a time of sexual uncertainty for a lot of people. There is much deliberation and much exploration, and, especially for a lot of teens who identify as being on the LGBTQ spectrum, there is much fluidity. On Monday you’re totally in love with that redheaded girl in Geometry; on Tuesday she blows you off so you hate her; on Wednesday you hook up with her ex-boyfriend just to spite her; on Thursday you think hey, maybe you and the redhead’s ex-boyfriend could actually have, you know, a thing; on Friday you and the ex are picking out your prom clothes; then on Saturday you catch the ex exchanging sexy Facebook messages with your ex, and on Sunday you’ve totally moved on and are crushing hard on your field hockey coach. During all that time, are you worrying about your sexual identity? Maybe, but more likely you’re too busy exchanging melodramatic text messages with your best friend analyzing it all.
All of which, in my mind, ties back to the presence of bisexual characters in YA novels like so:
I think a huge chunk of the protagonists in LGBTQ YA novels, especially the girl protagonists, are bi. But they don’t get credit for it. Because the books themselves aren’t branded as bi in the books’ back cover copy, in reviews, in Publisher’s Marketplace blurbs, etc.
Because novels are about problems. And usually, the problem when you’re a teenager isn’t that you’re attracted to people of both genders. Attraction to people of the opposite sex is the norm; it’s expected. The problem is that you’re attracted to someone of the same sex. So that’s what books tend to focus on.
So a book gets branded as a “lesbian” book because it’s about a girl having a relationship with another girl. Sometimes one or both of those girls explicitly refers to themselves as a lesbian, but just as often, maybe more often, the protagonist just spends the book obsessing over the feelings she’s having about this one particular girl. (Btw, I’m talking about girl books here because that’s what I write myself and that’s most of what I read as well; on the boy end of the spectrum, I think this happens much less often.)
It’s very normal, in LGBTQ YA that focus on girls, for one of the main characters to start the book with a boyfriend, and from whom she then grows apart after she meets a girl she likes more. But that doesn’t always mean this girl is never going to have another boyfriend for the rest of her life. She could very well go back to dating exclusively boys once this romance with the girl ends. But we readers won’t hear about that, because the book usually ends way before that happens. (Unless it doesn’t. Think Kissing Jessica Stein ― which isn’t a YA novel, but which might as well be one. Are the characters in that movie bisexual? Maybe. Does it matter? Not really.)
So in my view, a lot of the YA books that could theoretically be classified as “bi” actually wind up classified as “gay” due to the particular window of the character’s lives we’re seeing, and, just as importantly, due to our obsessions with categorizing things. We like to put books into boxes, just as people like to put themselves and others into boxes. (This isn’t limited to LGBTQ books at all, btw; think of the constant issues with urban fantasy versus paranormal romance versus supernatural versus straight-up fantasy ― and on and on.)
It’s true that a lot of high school kids who identify as being on the LGBTQ spectrum would choose describe themselves as bi, if they had to pick a label. And the explicit selection of the “bi” label doesn’t happen that often in YA fiction; at least, not in novels that focus on girl/girl relationships. In fact, the awesome Empress of the World by Sara Ryan is the only example that comes to mind in which that happens ― and in that book, it happens because the protagonist gets frustrated with all her friends assuming that because she’s dating a girl, that makes her gay.
But as same-sex relationships become more accepted, labels are becoming less and less relevant. More important, especially to teenagers, is who you’re attracted to at any given moment. High school kids have college and/or young adulthood in front of them, and they know they’ll get to spend that time sleeping with people of various genders and narrowing down the scope of to whom they’re attracted. Teens don’t need to spend their valuable time giving themselves headaches over what label describes them. They’d rather give themselves headaches about why the girl (or boy) they like won’t text them back.
Not to bring everything back to Glee, but there’s been a lot of debate since the big Brittany/Santana scene a few weeks ago about whether the girls are gay or bi. I think that’s missing the point. What matters to Santana isn’t whether she’s also attracted to boys. What matters is that she’s in love with this girl right now. By the time Santana is in her 30s, she’ll have the details all figured out, but at this point in her life, she has no reason to care.
Not to mention that the “bisexual” label can be a difficult one to pledge yourself to at any age. It’s much easier to just pick “straight” or “gay” ― everyone knows what those mean. Even among the LGBTQ-identified, there’s much debate about the word “bi.” Are you bi if you kind of like one gender but have only ever had relationships with the other? Do you have to be equally, 50-50 attracted to both genders to qualify as bi? What if you reject the binary system of gender to begin with? What if you only like one gender now but you used to like the other ― what does that make you? (I cannot tell you how many arguments I’ve gotten into with Buffy fans about whether Willow was the Judas of the bi community.)
None of which is to say that I don’t wish there were more books in which teen characters explored their sexual identities in more depth. I do, oh lordy, I do. The very first LGBTQ YA book I ever read was The Bermudez Triangle by Maureen Johnson, which has probably my favorite bisexual YA character of all time ― except that I’m pretty sure she never actually identifies herself as such. Because she’s still figuring it all out. And she’s still figuring it all out when the book ends. Because that’s what teens do.
Sigh. That’s why I love to write to write about teenagers. Because all that self-exploration is so fascinating.
So anyway. That’s me. What do you wish you saw more of in LGBTQ YA?
Mar 31, 2011 @ 23:12:30
I love this post…especially what you say about the “window” of time that we see in books (or, hell, in life. I may have fallen in love with a man and had a couple of kids, but that doesn’t mean I don’t have a crush on the field hockey coach, lol!) I’m just a huge believer in shades of gray and fluidity, and I try to write with that in mind. People do seek out labels, though–or at least they might try a few out for a while. It can feel more comfortable in our society to be able to define yourself or to allow yourself to be defined, even if you’re not sure that the box entirely fits.
Apr 01, 2011 @ 18:20:55
It is so interesting, I think, the way we feel like we have to label everything about ourselves (and each other!) according to standards someone else came up with, regardless of whether we actually agree with them! Sometimes I wish I’d taken more than the required Experimental Psych 115 survey in my college psych department just so I’d better understand what it is about our brains that makes us all so obsessed with sometimes-arbitrary categorization…
Apr 01, 2011 @ 10:53:35
Such an awesome post. I totally agree–teenagers are still discovering themselves, as well as their feelings about others, so sometimes it’s hard to determine a character’s sexuality if we’re just given a glimpse into their lives. Oh, and I HAVE to check out that Maureen Johnson novel.
Apr 01, 2011 @ 18:23:28
It’s really a pretty awesome book. I wish it had taken off the way some of her other books did; I would love to read a sequel!
Apr 02, 2011 @ 23:38:40
Fascinating post. I think pretty much everything you said is true…and it really WOULD be nice if people didn’t label things quite as much, especially sexuality but I guess that’s just what happens. I’m a college student and I belong to what’s essentially a gay/straight alliance. One of the guys (who was gay) mentioned that he used to have a really hard time understanding people that were bi. I found that interesting, because it’s like straight people having a hard time understanding gay people. Sexuality aside, we all have trouble understanding other people. That doesn’t mean you should be mean about it…but books that deal with these things are nice.
I think more books where people bring up the label bi would be nice, and probably really helpful for teens that aren’t sure what they are and don’t want to pick a side. They don’t have to label themselves bi either, but it might help them if they saw the option around more.
Speaking of the club I mentioned, we went over the kinsey scale…which I really like. It’s interesting to see that not everyone that identifies as gay is totally on one side of the spectrum and the same for people that are straight. I know, for me, I’d be more likely to pick around 1 or 2 (3 being the middle or “bi”) most days. I don’t think I’d ever be 0…completely and totally straight. I don’t find most people ARE if they really think about it.
My current MS deals with one of the characters being bi, which comes into some of the conflict. If you love a girl AND a boy…who do you choose? That’s the idea in simple, simple terms…as the question is MUCH harder to answer in the story.
-Lauren
Apr 05, 2011 @ 21:15:09
It’s all so interesting to think about. You brought up the Kinsey scale, which I used to be mildly obsessed with, but as I got older I remember feeling like the Kinsey scale didn’t work for me and someone told me about the Klein grid, which is much more complex and daunting but for a lot of people, including me at that point in my life, more applicable. Sometimes this stuff is just hard to pinpoint. Which in turn can be difficult to fathom for those people for whom sexual orientation isn’t complicated at all (which of course is the majority of people).
Anyway, thanks for commenting and glad the post resonated with you!
Aug 03, 2011 @ 16:20:44
Awesome post – especially the reference to Kissing Jessica Stein, which is one of my favourite movies EVER!
Aug 03, 2011 @ 17:35:52
You make a good argument about windows of a person’s life in books but I still wonder what the author was thinking. Maybe the author didn’t think too much on whether the MC would hop back and forth between genders in the future. I guess you can’t really know unless you ask the author yourself. Of course, if other writers are anything like me then yeah, the author did think about the future of the characters and would definitely know. Then it’s just a matter of if the details of that future is important to the story (which obviously doesn’t seem the case.)
Call Me Al » Articles!: Collective Works
Sep 02, 2011 @ 23:03:21